Cases 11 - 20 of 202
Hackett v. Guam Agency in Video 4
as 1:2023cv00006
Plaintiff:
Clifford Hackett
Defendant:
Guam Agency in Video 4
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Hackett v. Guam Agency in Video 5
as 1:2023cv00007
Plaintiff:
Clifford Hackett
Defendant:
Guam Agency in Video 5
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Hackett v. Guam Agency in Video 6
as 1:2023cv00008
Plaintiff:
Clifford Hackett
Defendant:
Guam Agency in Video 6
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Hackett v. Guam Agency in Video 7
as 1:2023cv00009
Plaintiff:
Clifford Hackett
Defendant:
Guam Agency in Video 7
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Hackett v. Guam Agency in Video 9
as 1:2023cv00011
Plaintiff:
Clifford Hackett
Defendant:
Guam Agency in Video 9
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Hackett v. Guam Agency in Video 8
as 1:2023cv00010
Plaintiff:
Clifford Hackett
Defendant:
Guam Agency in Video 8
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00030
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Masen v. Consolidated Transportation Services, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv00026
Plaintiff:
Iosua Masen
Defendant:
Consolidated Transportation Services, Inc. doing business as CTSI Logistics Guam, Tyrone Elliott and Century Insurance Company (Guam) Limited
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Dominguez et al v. U.S. Naval Hospital Guam
as 1:2022cv00022
Plaintiff:
Huey P. Dominguez and Ekaterina Dominguez
Defendant:
U.S. Naval Hospital Guam
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Medical Malpractice
Gumataotao v. Highsmith et al
as 1:2022cv00019
Plaintiff:
Gary Wayne Francis Gumataotao
Defendant:
David Jeffrey Highsmith, Government of Guam and Does I and II Insurance Companies
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
