Cases 11 - 20 of 30
Spillman et al v. Lawless et al
as 2:2016cv00172
Plaintiff:
Julie A. Spillman , Jayden A. Spillman , Makayla Spillman and others
Defendant:
Teresa Lawless, VFS Leasing Co. and Western Express, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Gentry v. Mead et al
as 2:2016cv00100
Plaintiff:
Russell D. Gentry
Defendant:
Jerry Mead and Xeriux, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Baggett v. Gentry et al
as 4:2016mc00001
Plaintiff:
Mac E. Baggett, Sr.
Defendant:
Rick Adams Gentry and Danny A. Thomas
Gentry v. Beckstrom
as 3:2015cv00449
Respondent:
Gary Beckstrom
Petitioner:
Ralph Gentry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Gentry v. Rapid International USA, Inc et al
as 3:2015cv00021
Defendant:
Rapid International USA, Inc and Rapid International LTD
Plaintiff:
Mark Gentry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Gordon v. Bolton et al
as 3:2014cv00580
Plaintiff:
Martin Albert Gordon
Defendant:
Mark Bolton, Dewayne Clark, Eric Troutman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
George v. Corizon, Inc. et al
as 3:2013cv00822
Plaintiff:
Samantha George
Defendant:
Corizon, Inc. , Kimberly Strong, Mark E. Bolton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
NVZ Capital, LLC v. Gentry et al
as 7:2012cv00105
Plaintiff:
NVZ Capital, LLC
Defendant:
Hobert Gentry, Bryan Lee Wagner, Ashley Wagner and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Albury et al v. Daymar Colleges Group, LLC, et al
as 3:2011cv00573
Plaintiff:
Angela Albury , Cassi Allen , Katrina Allen and others
Defendant:
Daymar Colleges Group, LLC , Daymar Learning of Paducah, Inc. , Daymar Learning of Ohio, Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Haffey et al v. Gentry Mechanical Systems, Inc. et al
as 5:2011cv00188
Plaintiff:
Shane M. Haffey
Defendant:
Gentry Mechanical Systems, Inc., State Farm Bank, F.S.B., Deutsche Bank National Trust Company Americas and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
