Cases 11 - 20 of 33
Delarosa v Great Neck Saw Manufacturers, Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv00402
Defendant:
Great Neck Saw Manufacturers, Inc., George Edward Murphy III, O'Reilly Auto Enterprises, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
James Delarosa doing business as Delarosa Auto and Diesel
Not Classified By Court:
Robert Allen Black
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Purdy v. Davis
as 5:2020cv00944
Respondent:
Lori Davis and Bobby Lumpkin
Petitioner:
George Edward Purdy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Purdy v. Davis
as 4:2020cv02785
Petitioner:
George Edward Purdy
Respondent:
Lorie Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Purdy v. Richard P LeBlanc Unit
as 3:2020cv00737
Petitioner:
George Edward Purdy
Respondent:
Richard P LeBlanc Unit and Lorie Davis-Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Smith v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 4:2019cv00927
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration - Interested Party
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security and Andrew Saul
Plaintiff:
George Edward Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Frosch v. Garcia
as 3:2017cv00332
Plaintiff:
George Edward Frosch
Defendant:
Roy Garcia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robinson v. Ruby Truck Line Inc. et al
as 7:2016cv00665
Plaintiff:
George Edward Robinson, Jr.
Defendant:
Ruby Truck Line Inc. and Lidia Ann Elias
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Frosch v. Moberly et al
as 1:2016cv00152
Plaintiff:
George Edward Frosch
Defendant:
Marsha Moberly, Charles Shipman and James Lafavors
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Frosch v. Moberly et al
as 2:2016cv00174
Plaintiff:
George Edward Frosch
Defendant:
Marsha Moberly, Charles Shipman and James Lafavors
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Frosch v. Davis-Director TDCJ-CID
as 1:2016cv00138
Petitioner:
George Edward Frosch
Respondent:
Lorie Davis-Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
