Cases 11 - 20 of 22
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv01680
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Moore v. Holmes et al
as 1:2015cv01895
Plaintiff:
Dorothy Marie Moore
Defendant:
Keith Holmes, Officer Sycz and Greater Cleveland Regional Transit Authority (RTA)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv01219
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12131
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv01729
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv01655
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv01413
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
ArrivalStar S.A. et al v. Greater Cleveland Regional Transit Authority
as 1:2012cv00475
Plaintiff:
ArrivalStar S.A. and Melvino Technologies Limited
Defendant:
Greater Cleveland Regional Transit Authority
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Wray v. Norfolk Southern Railway Company et al
as 1:2011cv00740
Defendant:
Norfolk Southern Railway Company , Greater Cleveland Regional Transit Authority , Mark A. Parks, Jr. and others
Plaintiff:
Jerry Wray
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 11702
Warith v. Greater Cleveland Regional Transit Authority (RTA) et al
as 1:2010cv02098
Defendant:
Greater Cleveland Regional Transit Authority (RTA) and Amalgamated Transit Union Local Chapter 268
Plaintiff:
Laura Warith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Magda et al v. Greater Cleveland Regional Transit Authority et al
as 1:2010cv00800
Plaintiff:
Jonel Magda and Liliya Magda
Defendant:
Greater Cleveland Regional Transit Authority and John McGlaughlin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
