Cases 11 - 20 of 20
Richardson v. Superintendent of Piedmont Regional Jail et al
as 3:2018cv00891
Plaintiff:
Gregory Richardson
Defendant:
Superintendent of Piedmont Regional Jail and Commonwealth of Virginia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Richardson v. Commonwealth of Virginia et al
as 3:2017cv00607
Plaintiff:
Gregory Richardson
Defendant:
Commonwealth of Virginia, Jack Baber, Jason Wilson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Richardson v. Commonwealth of Virginia et al
as 3:2017cv00525
Plaintiff:
Gregory Richardson
Defendant:
Commonwealth of Virginia, Theresa Royall, Circuit Court of Nottoway County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Richardson v. Virginia State Department Of Corrections
as 3:2017cv00101
Plaintiff:
Gregory Richardson
Defendant:
Virginia State Department Of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Richardson v. Caddell et al
as 3:2016cv00067
Plaintiff:
Gregory Richardson
Defendant:
Caddell, Jones, Randolph and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Richardson v. Commonwealth of Virginia
as 3:2015cv00380
Petitioner:
Gregory Richardson
Respondent:
Commonwealth of Virginia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Richardson v. Commonwealth of Virginia et al
as 3:2015cv00224
Plaintiff:
Gregory Richardson
Defendant:
Commonwealth of Virginia, Debra Ferguson, County of Nottoway and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Richardson v Commonwealth of Virginia
as 3:2013cv00275
Plaintiff:
Gregory Richardson
Defendant:
Commonwealth of Virginia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Richardson v. Superintendent of Piedmont Regional Jail
as 3:2013cv00249
Petitioner:
Gregory Richardson
Respondent:
Superintendent of Piedmont Regional Jail
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Richardson v. Commonwealth of Virginia
as 3:2009cv00534
Plaintiff:
Gregory Richardson
Defendant:
Commonwealth of Virginia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
