Cases 11 - 20 of 27
Robert Campbell v. Deborah Hickey
as 12-5093
Petitioner - Appellant:
ROBERT CAMPBELL
Respondent - Appellee:
DEBORAH A. HICKEY, Warden
Calvin Goddard v. Jason Terris, et al
as 11-6023
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CALVIN LEE GODDARD
Defendant - Appellee:
JASON TERRIS, AW Clinical Programs, Individually, DEBORAH HICKEY, Warden, Individually, LUIS A. MORALES, M.D., Individually and others
Brian Patrick v. Deborah Hickey
as 11-5803
Petitioner - Appellant:
BRIAN LEE PATRICK
Respondent - Appellee:
DEBORAH A. HICKEY, Warden, Warden
Nathaniel Simpkins v. Deborah Hickey
as 11-5398
Petitioner - Appellant:
NATHANIEL SIMPKINS
Respondent - Appellee:
DEBORAH HICKEY, Warden, Warden
Herbert Warden v. Jason Terris, et al
as 11-5301
Plaintiff - Appellant:
HERBERT G. WARDEN
Defendant - Appellee:
JASON TERRIS, Associate Warden, RIOS, GROWSE and others
Calvin Goddard v. Jason Terris, et al
as 11-5258
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CALVIN LEE GODDARD
Defendant - Appellee:
JASON TERRIS, Individually, DEBORAH A. HICKEY, Warden, Individually, LUIS A. MORALES, M.D. and others
Defendant:
JOSEPH HOOD, Individually, JASPER WHITE, RON WALKER, Individually and others
James Kimball v. Deborah Hickey
as 10-6375
Petitioner - Appellant:
JAMES T. KIMBALL
Respondent - Appellee:
DEBORAH HICKEY, Warden
Patrick Simpson, et al v. Natalie Riley, et al
as 10-6018
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PATRICK J. SIMPSON, DANIEL ANTHONY WEYMOUTH, RICHARD GALIETTI and others
Defendant - Appellee:
NATALIE RILEY, RDAP Staff, AMANDA HUGHES, RDAP Staff and HICKEY, Warden
Patrick Simpson, et al v. Natalie Riley, et al
as 10-5994
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PATRICK J. SIMPSON, DANIEL ANTHONY WEYMOUTH, RICHARD GALIETTI and others
Defendant - Appellee:
NATALIE RILEY, RDAP Staff, AMANDA HUGHES, RDAP Staff and HICKEY, Warden
Daniel Giannini v. Deborah Hickey
as 10-5531
Petitioner - Appellant:
DANIEL GIANNINI
Respondent - Appellee:
DEBORAH A. HICKEY, Warden, Warden
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
