Cases 11 - 20 of 99
Hayes v. Brown et al
as 6:2023cv00109
Plaintiff:
Robert Patrick Hayes
Defendant:
Kate Brown, Corey Fhuere, Heidi Steward and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv01469
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv01215
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Diaz v. Oregon Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2022cv01025
Plaintiff:
Enrique Zacarias Diaz
Defendant:
Oregon Department of Corrections, J. Curha, N. Vanwechal and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Self v. State of Oregon et al
as 2:2022cv01016
Plaintiff:
Kurtis Self
Defendant:
State of Oregon, Melissa Hughs and Patrick Maney, NP
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pinsky v. Peters et al
as 6:2022cv00781
Plaintiff:
Robert Andrew Pinsky
Defendant:
Colette Peters, Heidi Steward, Michael Gower and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shelley v. Peters et al
as 6:2022cv00669
Plaintiff:
Tanner Elliott Shelley
Defendant:
Colette Peters, Heidi Steward, Brian Belleque and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2022cv00409
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Hughes v. Strauss et al
as 2:2021cv01853
Plaintiff:
RONNELL T HUGHES and Ronnell Hughes
Defendant:
Nolan Levi Strauss, May Trucking Company, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv00991
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
