Cases filed in District of Columbia
Cases 11 - 18 of 18
HERNDON v. UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION et al
as 1:2013cv01929
Petitioner: JOHN K. HERNDON
Respondent: UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION, UNITED STATES MARSHALS SERVICE, FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
LINCHPINS OF LIBERTY et al v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2013cv00777
Plaintiff: LINCHPINS OF LIBERTY , PATRIOTS EDUCATING CONCERNED AMERICANS NOW , GREENWICH TEA PARTY PATRIOTS OF SOUTH JERSEY, INC. and others
Defendant: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE, JACOB J. LEW and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
DYDZAK v. SCHWARZENEGGER et al
as 1:2012cv01534
Plaintiff: DANIEL DAVID DYDZAK
Defendant: ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER, MARIA SHRIVER, ERIC H. HOLDER, JR. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
JONES v. UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2010cv00910
Plaintiff: DONALD G. JONES
Defendant: UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT, WILLIAM K. SUTER, GAIL JOHNSON and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241
Type: Civil Rights Voting
v. U.S. FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION et al
as 1:2009cv01924
Plaintiff: GARY HULL, RIMA E. LAIBOW, SUSANNE FIELD and others
Defendant: U.S. FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, KATHLEEN SEBELIUS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Type: Other Statutes None
HULL v. MATTHEW
as 1:2008cv01066
Plaintiff: REYNOLD HULL
Defendant: WALTER MATTHEW
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Type: Civil Rights None
HULL v. GIBBSON
as 1:2008cv00818
Plaintiff: REYNOLD HULL
Defendant: JOE GIBBSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Type: Civil Rights None
HULL v. WOOD
as 1:2008cv00817
Plaintiff: REYNOLD HULL
Defendant: JERRY WOOD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Type: Civil Rights None

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?