Cases 11 - 20 of 32
Kirtman v. Grismer et al
as 5:2016cv00386
Plaintiff:
Derrick Eugene Kirtman
Defendant:
Margaret Grismer, Todd Lawrence, Katherine Demer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2016cv00295
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Husky Ventures Inc v. Porter et al
as 5:2015cv00637
Plaintiff:
Husky Ventures Inc
Defendant:
J Russell Porter, Michael A Gerlich, Michael McCown and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2015cv00196
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Hansen v. Social Security Administration
as 6:2014cv00315
Plaintiff:
Linda Ann Hansen
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Garrett v. Hansen et al
as 6:2014cv00154
Plaintiff:
Dwayne M. Garrett
Defendant:
Carol M. Hansen, Carlotta Gordon, Robert Bell and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Hansen v. Social Security Administration
as 4:2014cv00120
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Lloyd Hansen
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Ray v. Bradford et al
as 5:2013cv00697
Plaintiff:
Edward V Ray, III
Defendant:
S Bradford, R Ferguson, Moates and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kirtman v. United States Department of Justice et al
as 5:2013cv00693
Plaintiff:
Derrick Eugene Kirtman
Defendant:
United States Department of Justice, Federal Bureau of Prisons, Federal Correctional Institution El Reno OK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lievens v. Wendling Trucking, Inc. et al
as 6:2013cv00130
Plaintiff:
Derek Lievens
Defendant:
Wendling Trucking, Inc. , Donald William Vanconant, Diamond Companies, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
