Cases 11 - 20 of 23
Cornell v. Anderson et al
as 4:2016cv00297
Plaintiff:
Robert Alan Cornell
Defendant:
Karen Anderson, Jana Hacker, Harbans Deol and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chumley v. Sparks et al
as 4:2016cv00096
Plaintiff:
Freddie N. Chumley
Defendant:
Stephen Sparks, Harbans Deol, Jane Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ware v. O'Brien et al
as 4:2015cv00220
Plaintiff:
Derrick Ware
Defendant:
Donald O'Brien and Harbans Deol
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Legear et al v. Sparks et al
as 4:2015cv00208
Plaintiff:
Christopher Legear
Defendant:
Stephen Sparks, Harbans Deol, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
William Edwards v. Stephen Sparks, et al
as 14-3552
Plaintiff - Appellant:
William Simpson Edwards
Defendant - Appellee:
Stephen E. Sparks, Nancy Roth, John Hawk and others
Defendant:
John Boilingcamp
Pete Alspach, et al v. John Baldwin, et al
as 14-3316
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Pete Alspach and Joel Smitherman
Defendant - Appellee:
John Baldwin, Nicholas Ludwick, John Ault and others
Kelvin Willform v. David Richter, et al
as 14-2207
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Kelvin D. Willform
Defendant - Appellee:
David Richter, Doctor Anamosa State Prison, Harbans Deol, Doctor, Polk County Conservation and others
Edwards v. Sparks et al
as 4:2013cv00093
Plaintiff:
William Simpson Edwards
Defendant:
Stephen E Sparks, John Boilingcamp, Nancy Roth and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Edwards v. Deol
as 4:2012cv00320
Plaintiff:
William Simpson Edwards
Defendant:
Harbans Deol and Stephen Sparks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cooper et al v. Vilsack et al
as 1:2011cv00141
Plaintiff:
Dorray Darnell Cooper , John L Hrbek and Joel P McKeag
Defendant:
Thomas J Vilsack, Chester J Culver, Terry E Branstad and others
Intervenor_plaintiff:
Steven Rowley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
