Cases 11 - 20 of 24
Riston et al v. Klausmair
as 1:2017cv03766
Plaintiff:
John Riston and Amy Hartman
Defendant:
Kurt Klausmair
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Arbogast v. 36 S. Eutaw, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv03517
Plaintiff:
Jessica Arbogast and Amanda Hartman
Defendant:
36 S. Eutaw, Inc. and George Kritikos
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Hartman v. Colvin
as 1:2016cv04026
Plaintiff:
Corina Hartman
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Hartman v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv03932
Plaintiff:
Judith Hartman
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc., Johnson & Johnson, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Balduini et al v. KBR Inc. et al
as 8:2015cv03531
Defendant:
KBR Inc, Kellog Brown and Root Services, Inc. and KBR Technical Services Inc.
Plaintiff:
Jeff Balduini, William Vance, Brett Nutter and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Hartman v. Colvin
as 1:2014cv03168
Plaintiff:
Shirley Hartman
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Thirty-Four Marketplace, LLC v. Euphoria Food Group LLC et al
as 1:2014cv03003
Plaintiff:
Thirty-Four Marketplace, LLC
Defendant:
Euphoria Food Group LLC and Philip D. Hartman, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Dominque v. Hartman et al
as 8:2013cv03446
Plaintiff:
Monica Dominque
Defendant:
Gary D. Hartman and John H. Garza
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Thirty-Four Marketplace, LLC v. Hartman
as 1:2011cv02015
Plaintiff:
Thirty-Four Marketplace, LLC
Defendant:
Philip David Hartman, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Castaneda et al v. Equine Architectural Products, Inc. et al
as 1:2011cv00822
Plaintiff:
Azael Castaneda , Juanito Novelo , Leonel Perez and others
Defendant:
Equine Architectural Products, Inc. , Companion Animal Services, LLC , Redwood Knoll, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
