Cases 11 - 20 of 29
Herring v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2015cv03077
Plaintiff:
Karen Herring
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Herring v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv29477
Plaintiff:
Cheryl Herring
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Herring v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2014cv24772
Plaintiff:
Rebecca N. Herring
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Herring v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv18998
Plaintiff:
Donna Herring
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Herring v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv17742
Plaintiff:
Shelley Herring
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Herring v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv17288
Plaintiff:
Karen Herring
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc., Ethicon, LLC and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Herring v. DIMA S.L. et al
as 2:2014cv11809
Plaintiff:
Janet Herring
Defendant:
DIMA S.L. , Neomedic International, S.L. , Neomedic, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
In re: Neomedic Pelvic Repair System Products Liability Litigation
as 2:2014md02511
Plaintiff:
Tamatha Dickerson (WVSD CA 2:14-10693) , Eugenie Marie Thomas (WVSD CA 2:14-10694) , Tina Carpenter (WVSD CA 2:14-10721) and others
Defendant:
DIMA S.L. , Neomedic International, S.L. , Neomedic, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Herring v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv09271
Plaintiff:
Janet Elizabeth Herring
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc. and Tissue Science Laboratories Limited
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Herring v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv02529
Plaintiff:
Mavis Herring
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc. and Tissue Science Laboratories Limited
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
