Cases 11 - 20 of 101
Davison v. Houser
as 3:2022cv00234
Petitioner:
Dennis L Davison
Defendant:
Earl Houser
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
McClennaham v. Houser et al
as 3:2022cv00203
Plaintiff:
James McClennaham
Defendant:
Earl Houser, State of Alaska - Dept. of Corrections, Bauer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Talmadge v. Houser
as 3:2022cv00202
Petitioner:
Brett Alan James Talmadge
Respondent:
Earl Houser
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Copeland v. Houser
as 3:2022cv00201
Plaintiff:
Roger Copeland
Defendant:
Earl Houser
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Grossman v. Alaska Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2022cv00190
Plaintiff:
William Donald Grossman and Moondog
Defendant:
Alaska Department of Corrections, Earl Houser and Jen Winklemon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Urovak v. Houser
as 3:2022cv00184
Plaintiff:
Timothy Urovak
Defendant:
Earl Houser
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Stansberry v. Entry GCCC Disciplinary Committee et al
as 3:2022cv00180
Plaintiff:
Lee Roy J. Stansberry
Defendant:
Entry GCCC Disciplinary Committee, Supts Ansal, Houser and others
Stansberry v. Enter Alaska Public Defender Attorney Case File et al
as 3:2022cv00122
Plaintiff:
Lee Roy J. Stansberry
Defendant:
Enter Alaska Public Defender Attorney Case File, Sidney Billingslea, Johnson and others
Brooks v. Houser
as 3:2022cv00114
Petitioner:
Jason Ray Brooks
Respondent:
Earl Houser
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Conger v. Houser
as 2:2022cv00003
Petitioner:
Emerson Scott Conger
Respondent:
Earl L. Houser
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
