Cases 11 - 20 of 1,719
Fedder v. Delaware Attorney Generals Office
as 1:2024cv00464
Plaintiff:
Christopher J. Fedder
Defendant:
Delaware Attorney Generals Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Fedder v. Kester et al
as 1:2024cv00462
Plaintiff:
Christopher J. Fedder
Defendant:
Lewis Kester, Coplan Irena, Charles Simpson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Fedder v. Simpson
as 1:2024cv00463
Plaintiff:
Christopher J. Fedder
Defendant:
Charles Simpson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Hudda v. Hennessy et al
as 1:2024cv00449
Plaintiff:
Arif Hudda
Defendant:
Paul J. Hennessy, David K. Jones, Robert J. Mylod, Jr. and others
Beppler v. Capital One, N.A.
as 1:2024cv00446
Defendant:
Capital One, N.A. and Capital One Financial Corporation
Plaintiff:
Keith J. Beppler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
In Re: Meta Platforms, Inc. et al
as 1:2024mc00183
Petitioner:
Meta Platforms, Inc., Instagram, Inc., WhatsApp LLC and others
Respondent:
Michael J. Black
Bennett et al v. Bannon et al
as 1:2024cv00416
Plaintiff:
Ret. Sgt. Craig T. Bennett, Francine M. Bennett, Aliyah M. Bennett and others
Defendant:
Eric J. Bannon, Kirk William Ruquet, Matthew R. Sarkissian and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Miss Tiwaz v. Blades et al
as 1:2024cv00385
Plaintiff:
Miss Tiwaz and Miss Cea G. Mai
Defendant:
Staff Lt. Dean J. Blades, Deputy Warden Wise and Captain Scott Bradley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tiwaz v. Lowe et al
as 1:2024cv00384
Plaintiff:
Miss Tiwaz, Sir Tiwaz, Cea Gleanbead Mai and others
Defendant:
Dale Lowe, Erin, Staff Lt. Dean J. Blades and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hogan v. Altman et al
as 1:2024cv00375
Plaintiff:
Gerald Hogan
Defendant:
Elizabeth Altman, Gregory Garrison, Shih-Yin Ho and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
