Cases 11 - 20 of 182
v. PNC Bank, National Assocation et al
as 1:2016cv03116
Defendant:
PNC Bank, National Assocation , John H. Litzenberg, The Harford Bank and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Declaratory Judgement
PNC Bank, National Association v. Litzenberg et al
as 1:2016cv03117
Plaintiff:
PNC Bank, National Association
Defendant:
John H. Litzenberg, The Harford Bank, The United States of America and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Turner v. Shearin et al
as 1:2016cv03006
Defendant:
Bobby P. Shearin, Frank B. Bishop, D. Wade and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Douglas Turner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Department of Public Safety and Correctional Services et al
as 1:2016cv02729
Plaintiff:
Phillip Alvin Jones, Jr.
Defendant:
Department of Public Safety and Correctional Services, J. Michael Stouffer and Warden Armstead
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sorensen v. Doe et al
as 8:2015cv01198
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Sorensen
Defendant:
John Doe, John Hammond, John Wolfe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tarpley v. Moyer et al
as 1:2015cv01132
Plaintiff:
Steven E. Tarpley
Defendant:
Stephen T. Moyer, Bobby P. Shearin, Frank B. Bishop, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hall v. Stouffer
as 1:2015cv01008
Plaintiff:
David Wayne Hall
Defendant:
J. Michael Stouffer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fogle v. Stouffer et al
as 8:2015cv00355
Petitioner:
Anthony Fogle
Respondent:
J Michael Stouffer and Douglas Gansler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Moment v. Stouffer et al
as 1:2015cv00214
Petitioner:
Michael Moment
Respondent:
J. Michael Stouffer and The Attorney General Of The State Of Maryland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Gray v. Stouffer et al
as 1:2015cv00029
Petitioner:
Isaac Gray
Respondent:
J. Michael Stouffer and The Attorney General of the State of Maryland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
