Cases 11 - 20 of 27
HAILE et al v. HOUGHSTEIN et al
as 4:2016cv00621
Plaintiff:
J JAY SANDERS HAILE, VII and R JENKINS
Defendant:
J JONES, P J BONDI, STATE OF FLORIDA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Owens v. Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2016cv00225
Plaintiff:
Albert T. Owens, Jr.
Defendant:
Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, Toni Bowden, Ebony Harvey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
The United States of America v. Conchy Joe's Marine & Tackle, Inc. et al
as 4:2015cv10173
Plaintiff:
The United States of America
Defendant:
Conchy Joe's Marine & Tackle, Inc., Robert W Harris, Melissa E Harris and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
JONES v. MORGAN
as 1:2015cv00033
Petitioner:
CYNTHIA DENISE JONES
Respondent:
MARGUERITE J MORGAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Samph et al v. Morgan One Steel, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv00732
Plaintiff:
William Samph and Christopher Littrell
Defendant:
Morgan One Steel, Inc., Morgan One Steel, LLC and Scott J. Morgan
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 206
HUBSCHMAN v. MORGAN
as 4:2013cv00602
Plaintiff:
ALAN DANIEL HUBSCHMAN
Defendant:
MARGUERITE J MORGAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MCCROAN v. MORGAN
as 1:2013cv00221
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM TONY MCCROAN
Defendant:
MARGUERITE J MORGAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MCCROAN v. MORGAN
as 4:2014cv00040
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM TONY MCCROAN
Defendant:
MARGUERITE J MORGAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MCCROAN v. MORGAN, et al
as 4:2013cv00370
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM TONY MCCROAN
Defendant:
MARGUERITE J MORGAN and ADAM SMITH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MCCROAN v. FLORIDA STATE HOSPITAL
as 4:2013cv00360
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM TONY MCCROAN
Defendant:
FLORIDA STATE HOSPITAL, MARGUERITE J MORGAN, DANIEL HOLLAR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
