Cases 11 - 20 of 24
WILSON v. MCGINLEY et al
as 5:2016cv03258
Petitioner:
LEROY ANTONIO WILSON
Respondent:
THOMAS S. MCGINLEY, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF BERKS: JOHN T. ADAMS and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA: KATHLEEN KANE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
PEREZ v. TRITT et al
as 5:2014cv05472
Petitioner:
RAUL A. PEREZ-REYES
Respondent:
BRENDA L. TRITT, JOHN T. ADAMS, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
WASHINGTON v. BODER et al
as 5:2014cv04972
Plaintiff:
ALVIN WASHINGTON
Defendant:
JUSTIN BODER, JOHN T ADAMS, ADAM JOSEPH HOFFMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PEREZ-REYES v. CAMERON et al
as 5:2012cv04326
Petitioner:
RAUL A. PEREZ-REYES
Respondent:
KENNETH R. CAMERON, JOHN T. ADAMS, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF BERKS CO., PA. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
ADAMS v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2011cv50658
Plaintiff:
JOHN T. ADAMS
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
John T. Adams v. Seatrain Lines, Inc.
as PAE/2:10-CV-30980
Plaintiff:
John T. Adams
Defendant:
Seatrain Lines, Inc.
ADAMS v. FIBREBOARD CORPORATION
as 2:2010cv69542
Plaintiff:
JOHN T. ADAMS
Defendant:
FIBREBOARD CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Juston Boyle v. Paul Yatron, et al
as 10-1602
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JUSTON BAYARD BOYLE
Defendant - Appellee:
PAUL M. YATRON, JOHN T. ADAMS, CHRISTIAN Y. LEINBACH and others
BOYLE v. YATRON et al
as 5:2010cv00530
Plaintiff:
JUSTON BAYARD BOYLE
Defendant:
PAUL M. YATRON, JOHN T. ADAMS, CHRISTIAN Y. LEINBACH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ADAMS v. SEATRAIN LINES, INC.
as 2:2010cv30980
Plaintiff:
JOHN T. ADAMS
Defendant:
SEATRAIN LINES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
