Cases 11 - 20 of 40
RICHES v. ANISTON
as 3:2009cv00063
Plaintiff:
JONATHAN LEE RICHES
Defendant:
JENNIFER ANISTON
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
RICHES v. NADEL et al
as 1:2009cv00033
Plaintiff:
JONATHAN LEE RICHES doing business as ERVIN ANTONIO LUPOE
Defendant:
ARTHUR NADEL, SCOOP MANAGEMENT, SCOOP CAPITAL and others
Cause Of Action: (DO NOT USE) 28:1983 Civil Rights
Riches v. Warren et al
as 0:2009cv60226
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Lee Riches
Defendant:
Rick Warren
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Riches v. Trovolta et al
as 2:2009cv14045
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Lee Riches
Defendant:
Jett Trovolta, John Travolta, Kelly Preston and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
RICHES v. PALIN
as 4:2008cv00476
Plaintiff:
JONATHAN LEE RICHES
Defendant:
SARAH PALIN
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
RICHES v 700 BILLION BAILOUT PLAN, et al
as 1:2008cv00224
Plaintiff:
JONATHAN LEE RICHES, RAYMOND LAMB and CHARLES KEATING
Defendant:
SENATE BANKING COMMITTEE, ALI VELSHI, HENRY PAULSON and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Riches et al v. First Advantage Background Services Corp. et al
as 5:2008cv00248
Petitioner:
Jonathan Lee Riches
Respondent:
First Advantage Background Services Corp., First Advantage Credio LLC, Private Eyes Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Riches v. Karzai et al
as 5:2008cv00249
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Lee Riches
Defendant:
Hamid Karzai, Yousuf Raza Gilani, Hoshyar Zebari and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Felix et al v. American Entitlement Serv.
as 2:2008cv14190
Plaintiff:
Gilberto Felix and Jonathan Lee Riches
Defendant:
American Entitlement Serv.
Cause Of Action: Bivens - Federal Prisoner Civil Rights
RICHES v KAZMIR
as 3:2008cv00211
Petitioner:
JONATHAN LEE RICHES
Respondent:
SCOTT KAZMIR, CHIEN-MING WANG and WILLIAMSBURG COUNTY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
