Cases 11 - 19 of 19
Rivera-Lebron v. Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority et al
as 3:2009cv01106
Plaintiff:
Gilberto Rivera-Lebron and Carmen M. Rivera-Torres
Defendant:
Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority, Jorge Rodriguez-Ruiz, Edwin Rivera-Serrano and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2008cv02237
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Debtor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2008cv01723
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2008cv01336
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2008cv01239
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
PPV Connections, Inc v. Galarza et al
as 3:2008cv01044
Plaintiff:
PPV Connections, Inc
Defendant:
Miriam Galarza, John Doe- Galarza, Conjugal Partnership Doe-Galarza and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
Rodriguez-Marcano et al v. Centro Medico del Turabo, Inc.
as 3:2007cv01739
Plaintiff:
Yolimar Rodriguez-Marcano, Jorge Rodriguez-Matos and Maria Yolanda Marcano-Rivera
Defendant:
Centro Medico del Turabo, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Medical Malpractice
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2007cv01680
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
United States of America (Rural Development) v. Nieves-Mojica et al
as 3:2007cv01405
Plaintiff:
United States of America (Rural Development)
Defendant:
Alicia Nieves-Mojica, Ana R. Rodriguez-Nieves, Carmen Rodriguez-Nieves and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1341 Complaint for Forfeiture
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
