Cases 11 - 20 of 175
Martell v. Joyce et al
as 1:2023cv00073
Plaintiff:
Jarred Lee Martell
Defendant:
Joseph Joyce, James Sayler, Barb Baily and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hoff v. Sayler
as 1:2023cv00059
Plaintiff:
Kevin Michael Hoff
Defendant:
James Sayler
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McGarvey v. USA
as 1:2023cv00056
Petitioner:
Curtis James McGarvey
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Brickle-Hicks v. Sayler
as 1:2023cv00017
Petitioner:
Morris Jerome Brickle-Hicks
Respondent:
James Sayler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
McGinnis v. Slayer et al
as 1:2023cv00018
Petitioner:
Neil Adams McGinnis
Respondent:
Warden James Slayer, ND DOCR, Colby Braun and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ali v. Sayler
as 1:2023cv00002
Petitioner:
Abdulrahman Ibrahim Ali
Respondent:
James Sayler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hoff v. Krabbenhoft et al
as 1:2022cv00209
Plaintiff:
Kevin Michael Hoff
Defendant:
Dave Krabbenhoft, James Sayler, Jordan Keller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Herman v. Sayler et al
as 1:2022cv00203
Plaintiff:
Vance Herman
Defendant:
James Sayler, Dave Krabbenhoft and Steven Bement
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
St. John et al v. Lees
as 3:2022cv00193
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey St. John and Julie St. John
Defendant:
James Lees
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Wilkinson v. Northeast Central District Court Clerk of Administration et al
as 3:2022cv00180
Plaintiff:
Warren James Wilkinson, Sr.
Defendant:
Northeast Central District Court Clerk of Administration, Judge John Thelen, Andrew Eyre and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
