Cases 11 - 20 of 24
Jones vs. Caskey, et al.
as 3:2013cv00935
Plaintiff:
James C. Jones
Defendant:
Dale Caskey, Sandra Atwood, Patrisha Dudley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones vs. Caskey, et al.
as 4:2011cv00048
Plaintiff:
James C. Jones
Defendant:
Dale Caskey, Sandra Atwood, Patrisha Dudley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. MDOC et al
as 3:2010mc00023
Petitioner:
James Christopher Jones
Respondent:
MDOC and Jim Hood
Jones v. Epps et al
as 4:2010cv00137
Plaintiff:
James C. Jones
Defendant:
Christopher Epps, E. L. Sparkman and David Petrie
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Epps et al
as 4:2010cv00136
Plaintiff:
James C. Jones
Defendant:
Christopher Epps, E. L. Sparkman and David Petrie
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Bingham et al
as 3:2010cv00085
Petitioner:
James Earl Jones
Respondent:
Margaret Bingham and Attorney General of the State of Mississippi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jones v. Pearson
as 5:2010cv00132
Plaintiff:
James Derrick Jones
Defendant:
Bruce Pearson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Armstrong et al v. American Camper Manufacturing, LLC et al
as 1:2009cv00440
Plaintiff:
Sandra Armstrong, Tawanna Faye Armstrong, Roosevelt Armstrong, Jr. and others
Defendant:
American Camper Manufacturing, LLC, CH2M Hill Constructors, Inc., Bechtel National, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Jones v. State of Mississippi et al
as 3:2009cv00052
Petitioner:
James C. Jones
Respondent:
State of Mississippi and Jim Hood
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jones et al v. International Paper Company et al
as 5:2009cv00011
Plaintiff:
James A. Jones, James A. Jones, Michelle Jones and others
Defendant:
International Paper Company and John Does 1-20
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
