Cases 11 - 20 of 39
Goldman v. Moore et al
as 4:2010cv00082
Plaintiff:
Antonio Goldman
Defendant:
Ruthie Moore, James Brewer and Lawrence Kelly
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jackson v. Brewer et al
as 2:2010cv00085
Petitioner:
Terry Savalas Jackson
Respondent:
James Brewer and Jim Hood
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Johnson v. Brewer et al
as 4:2010cv00028
Plaintiff:
Archie L. Johnson
Defendant:
James Brewer and Christoper Epps
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Morris v. Collins et al
as 4:2010cv00022
Plaintiff:
Willie Morris
Defendant:
Marcus Collins, S. Caldwell, Henry Maxwell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Humphrey v. Brewer, et al
as 2:2010cv00037
Petitioner:
Omar Khayyam Humphrey
Respondent:
James Brewer and Attorney General of the State of Mississippi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Commodore v. Epps et al
as 2:2010cv00022
Petitioner:
Edgar Commodore
Respondent:
Christopher B. Epps, James Brewer and Emitt L. Sparkman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Harris v. Epps et al
as 4:2009cv00119
Plaintiff:
Stephen Harris
Defendant:
Christopher Epps, Lanette Jordan, Lawrence Kelly and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carroll v. Maxwell et al
as 4:2009cv00115
Plaintiff:
Wiley Zachary Carroll
Defendant:
Henry Maxwell, Lawrence Kelly and James Brewer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McLendon v. Ladner et al
as 4:2009cv00097
Plaintiff:
Gary McLendon
Defendant:
Brian Ladner, James Brewer, Norell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harris v. Epps et al
as 4:2009cv00072
Plaintiff:
Stephen Harris
Defendant:
Christopher Epps, Pamela Robinson, James Brewer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
