Cases 11 - 20 of 52
Williams v. Allison et al
as 3:2023cv01088
Plaintiff:
John Wesley Williams
Defendant:
Kathleen Allison, Gavin Newsom, James Hill and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Tyrell Ainsworth v. Jeff Macombre et al
as 2:2023cv04263
Plaintiff:
Tyrell Ainsworth
Defendant:
Jeff Macombre, Trent Allen, Tammy L. Campbell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
David Sabino Quair III v. James Hill et al
as 5:2023cv00832
Plaintiff:
David Sabino Quair III and David Sabino Quair, III
Defendant:
James Hill, John Merchant, H. Moseley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Manuel Panduro v. James Hill et al
as 5:2023cv00784
Plaintiff:
Manuel Panduro
Defendant:
James Hill, Guzman and B. Colon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thyrone Ryan Stewart v. James Hill et al
as 5:2023cv00544
Petitioner:
Thyrone Ryan Stewart
Respondent:
James Hill and Rob Bonta
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ivan Goodlow v. James Hill
as 2:2023cv01918
Petitioner:
Ivan Goodlow
Respondent:
James Hill
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(HC) Loftis v. Hill
as 1:2023cv00002
Petitioner:
Marquise DeAngelo Loftis
Respondent:
James Hill
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(HC) Loftis v. Hill
as 2:2022cv02299
Petitioner:
Marquise DeAngelo Loftis
Respondent:
James Hill
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
LaQuinton D. Bowers, Sr v. James Hill et al
as 5:2022cv02072
Plaintiff:
LaQuinton D. Bowers, Sr
Defendant:
James Hill, R. Roble, V. Vasques and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jose Armando Zelaya v. James Hill
as 2:2022cv08311
Petitioner:
Jose Armando Zelaya
Respondent:
James Hill
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
