Cases 11 - 20 of 27
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2015cv00630
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1105 (a) Aliens: Habeas Corpus to Release INS Det
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2015cv00456
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Sanchez-Rodriguez v. Lucero et al
as 3:2015cv00101
Petitioner:
A.S.R.
Respondent:
Robert Gaurdian, Janice Killian and Enrique Lucero
Notice Only Party:
Magdalena Jara
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv00512
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Edelkind v. Killian et al
as 1:2009cv05835
Petitioner:
Jamie Edelkind
Respondent:
Janice Killian, John Yost, Carolyn Sabol and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Yosef v. Killian et al
as 1:2008cv11086
Petitioner:
Ofer Yosef
Respondent:
Janice Killian, Michael MuCasey, Maureen Killion and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Smith v. Noakes et al
as 1:2008cv03028
Plaintiff:
John Smith
Defendant:
Michael Noakes, Robert Tassinari, Janice Killian and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Regis v. Killian et al
as 1:2007cv09756
Plaintiff:
Richard Regis
Defendant:
Janice Killian and Michael J. Garcia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Dicks v. Killian et al
as 1:2007cv09757
Plaintiff:
Eric Dicks
Defendant:
Janice Killian and Michael J. Garcia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Stuart v. Killian et al
as 1:2007cv08095
Petitioner:
Leroy Stuart
Respondent:
Janice Killian and Frank D. Whitney
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
