Cases 11 - 19 of 19
BRYCE et al v. BIOMET INC. et al
as 3:2019cv08755
Plaintiff:
CHARLES BRYCE and MAUREEN O. BRYCE
Defendant:
BIOMET INC., BIOMET MANUFACTURING CORP., BIOMET ORTHOPEDICS LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
RENZI v. OROGOLDS INC. et al
as 1:2015cv08572
Plaintiff:
MARIE RENZI
Defendant:
OROGOLDS INC. , ABC CORPORATIONS I-X and JOHN DOE(S) I-X
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
MURPHY et al v. ANCORA PSYCHIATRIC HOSPITAL et al
as 3:2015cv08410
Plaintiff:
TARA MURPHY , JOHN F. and MARGARET A. MURPHY
Defendant:
ANCORA PSYCHIATRIC HOSPITAL , STATE OF NEW JERSEY , PHYLIS DAVIS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
COZZENS v. WALMART et al
as 1:2014cv07150
Plaintiff:
ROSE COZZENS
Defendant:
WALMART and JOHN DOE(S) I-X
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
JOAO CONTROL & MONITORING SYSTEMS, LLC et al v. OLIVO et al
as 2:2013cv04419
Plaintiff:
JOAO CONTROL & MONITORING SYSTEMS, LLC and RAYMOND A. JOAO
Defendant:
JACK OLIVO, ESQ. , OLIVO LAW GROUP, P.C. , WARD & OLIVO and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity - Legal Malpractice
LUGO v. ROSADO et al
as 1:2012cv01119
Plaintiff:
LILLIAN LUGO
Defendant:
JOHN DOE(S) I-X, ABC PARTNERSHIP(S) I-X, XYZ CORPORATION(S) I-X and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv05054
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
D'ELIA et al v. GRAND CARIBBEAN COMPANY, LTD. et al
as 1:2009cv01707
Plaintiff:
MARIANNE P. D'ELIA and FRANCIS J. D'ELIA
Defendant:
GRAND CARIBBEAN COMPANY, LTD., THE ROYAL RESORTS GROUP, ROMBEC, S.A. DE C.V. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
D'ELIA et al v. GRAND CARIBBEAN COMPANY, LTD. et al
as 1:2009cv01143
Plaintiff:
MARIANNE P. D'ELIA and FRACIS J. D'ELIA
Defendant:
GRAND CARIBBEAN COMPANY, LTD., THE ROYAL RESORTS GROUP, ROMBEC, S.A. DE C.V. and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
