Cases 11 - 18 of 18
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2013cv00583
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
General Fidelity Insurance Company v. Sterling Companies, LLC et al
as 2:2012cv02429
Plaintiff:
General Fidelity Insurance Company
Defendant:
Sterling Companies, LLC , Ingram Tynes , Mellanie Wright and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Employers Mutual Casualty Company v. Tynes Development Corporation Inc et al
as 2:2012cv01630
Plaintiff:
Employers Mutual Casualty Company
Defendant:
Tynes Development Corporation Inc , Ingram D Tynes , Christopher D Kane and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
McIntyre v. Kane, et al (INMATE 3)
as 2:2011cv00530
Plaintiff:
Fredrick McIntyre
Defendant:
Thomas Kane, Ray Holt, Mosetta Nix and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Kane et al v. Pfizer, Inc et al
as 2:2011cv00085
Plaintiff:
Joseph L Kane, Plaintiffs' Liaison Counsel and Plaintiffs' Lead Counsel
Defendant:
Pfizer, Inc , Defendant's Liaison Counsel and Defendant's Lead Counsel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jordan et al v. Thomas Jefferson Foundation, Inc.
as 4:2010cv01534
Plaintiff:
Emma Kane Jordan , James Jordan and Sara Jordan Muschamp
Defendant:
Thomas Jefferson Foundation, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Kane v. LCA Vision, Inc.
as 2:2009cv00275
Plaintiff:
Scott Kane
Defendant:
LCA Vision, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
PS Data Services, Inc v. Kane Steel & Iron, LLC
as 2:2007cv00127
Plaintiff:
PS Data Services, Inc, PS Data Services, Inc and Paul S Sivak
Defendant:
Kane Steel & Iron, LLC and Kane Steel & Iron, LLC
Counter Claimant:
Kane Steel & Iron, LLC and Kane Steel & Iron, LLC
Counter Defendant:
Paul S Sivak, PS Data Services, Inc, Paul S Sivak and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338 Copyright Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
