Cases 11 - 20 of 112
Howard Raff v. USDC-CAOAK
as 18-70009
:
In re: HOWARD E. RAFF
Petitioner:
HOWARD E. RAFF
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, OAKLAND
Real Party In Interest:
KELLY HARRINGTON, Warden
Human Rights Defense Center v. County of Los Angeles, et al
as 17-56470
Plaintiff - Appellant:
HUMAN RIGHTS DEFENSE CENTER
Defendant - Appellee:
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, JIM MCDONNELL, He is sued in his individual capacity, NEAL TYLER, He is sued in his individual capacity and others
Kevin Bryant v. Gallagher, et al
as 14-16881
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KEVIN DARNELL BRYANT
Defendant - Appellee:
GALLAGHER, Correctional Officer at Kern Valley State Prison, A. ROMERO, Correctional Officer at Kern Valley State Prison, KELLY HARRINGTON, Warden, Warden at Kern Valley State Prison and others
Roger Martinez v. Kelly Harrington
as 14-56278
Petitioner - Appellant:
ROGER MARTINEZ
Respondent - Appellee:
KELLY HARRINGTON, Warden
Robert Bishop v. Kelly Harrington, et al
as 14-15145
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT BISHOP
Defendant - Appellee:
KELLY HARRINGTON, Warden, M. D. BITER, Warden, J. SOTO and others
Mario Molina v. Kelly Harrington
as 13-56985
Petitioner - Appellant:
MARIO ROBERTO MOLINA
Respondent - Appellee:
KELLY HARRINGTON, Warden
Terrance Steele, Jr. v. Kelly Harrington
as 13-56881
Petitioner - Appellant:
TERRANCE STEELE, Jr.
Respondent - Appellee:
KELLY HARRINGTON, Warden
Richard Armenta v. Kelly Harrington, et al
as 13-56853
Petitioner - Appellant:
RICHARD ARMENTA
Respondent - Appellee:
KELLY HARRINGTON, Warden and KAMALA D. HARRIS, Attorney General
Dashawn Graham v. Kelly Harrington
as 13-56555
Petitioner - Appellant:
DASHAWN GRAHAM
Respondent - Appellee:
KELLY HARRINGTON, Warden
Raymond Graham, et al v. Kelly Harrington
as 13-56554
Petitioner - Appellant:
RAYMOND D. GRAHAM and DASHAWN GRAHAM, Consolidated Petitioner
Respondent - Appellee:
KELLY HARRINGTON, Warden
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
