Cases 11 - 20 of 23
SPENCE v. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR AND INDUSTRY UNEMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION BOARD OF REVIEW LABOR
as 2:2007cv00443
Plaintiff:
KEVIN SPENCE
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR AND INDUSTRY UNEMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION BOARD OF REVIEW LABOR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
SPENCE v. DEPAUL
as 2:2007cv02221
Plaintiff:
KEVIN SPENCE
Defendant:
ROBERT DEPAUL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
SPENCE v. MAYS
as 2:2007cv00581
Plaintiff:
KEVIN SPENCE
Defendant:
NICE MAYS
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15 Antitrust Litigation
SPENCE v. ROSEN et al
as 2:2007cv01321
Plaintiff:
KEVIN SPENCE
Defendant:
GRADON ROSEN and ALLEN EPSTEIN LAW FIRM
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15 Antitrust Litigation
SPENCE v. PHILADELPHIA TRAFFIC COURT et al
as 2:2007cv01272
Plaintiff:
KEVIN SPENCE
Defendant:
PHILADELPHIA TRAFFIC COURT, ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY and VIRGINIA TRAFFIC COURT
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15 Antitrust Litigation
SPENCE v. NISSAN CAR DEALER
as 2:2007cv00428
Plaintiff:
KEVIN SPENCE
Defendant:
NISSAN CAR DEALER
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
SPENCE v. SPENCE
as 2:2007cv00579
Plaintiff:
KEVIN SPENCE
Defendant:
SHERODE SPENCE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
SPENCE v. GLENCOE MCGRAW AND SHEPARDS
as 2:2007cv00424
Plaintiff:
KEVIN SPENCE
Defendant:
GLENCOE MCGRAW AND SHEPARDS
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15 Antitrust Litigation
SPENCE v. SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
as 2:2007cv00580
Plaintiff:
KEVIN SPENCE
Defendant:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Anti-trust
SPENCE v. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR et al
as 2:2007cv00477
Plaintiff:
KEVIN SPENCE
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR and DEPARTMENT OF LABOR AND INDUSTRY UNEMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION BOARD OF REVIEW LABOR
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
