Cases 11 - 20 of 117
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv04174
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv19919
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
KAHN v. SANOFI US SERVICES, INC. et al
as 3:2021cv18765
Petitioner:
ELIZABETH KAHN
Respondent:
SANOFI US SERVICES, INC. and SANOFI- AVENTIS U.S., LLC
Interested Party:
DR. MICHAEL S. KOPRESKI
KAHN v. SANOFI US SERVICES, INC. et al
as 2:2021cv18765
Petitioner:
DR. MICHAEL S. KOPRESKI
Plaintiff:
ELIZABETH KAHN
Defendant:
SANOFI US SERVICES, INC. and SANOFI- AVENTIS U.S., LLC
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv16670
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv16013
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
KAHN v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2021cv14960
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER, INC., PERSONAL CARE PRODUCTS COUNCIL, JOHNSON & JOHNSON and others
In Re:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Plaintiff:
LIBBY KAHN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
GROSSBERGER v. FEIN SUCHS KAHN SHEPARD P.C. et al
as 3:2021cv12896
Defendant:
FEIN SUCHS KAHN SHEPARD P.C. and STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Plaintiff:
BEZALEL GROSSBERGER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GROSSBERGER v. STATE OF NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF LAW et al
as 3:2021cv12102
Defendant:
STATE OF NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF LAW and FEIN SUCHS KAHN SHEPARD P.C.
Plaintiff:
BEZALEL GROSSBERGER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GPA TOURING, INC. v. KAHN et al
as 2:2021cv07674
Defendant:
SANDY PINES INVESTMENT LLC, KAHN ADVISORS LLC, JOHN DOES 1-100 and others
Plaintiff:
GPA TOURING, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
