Cases 11 - 19 of 19
G-W Management Services, LLC v. Kang
as 8:2012cv03686
Defendant:
Yu Sok Kang
Plaintiff:
G-W Management Services, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Calle v. Or
as 8:2011cv00716
Plaintiff:
Jose Luis Rivas Calle
Defendant:
Chul Sun Kang Or
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Sam Wang Produce, Inc., et al v. MS Grand, Inc. et al
as 8:2010cv02286
Plaintiff:
Sam Wang Produce, Inc.
Defendant:
MS Grand, Inc., Min Sik Kang and Man Sun Kang
Cause Of Action: 07 U.S.C. § 499 Agricultural Commodities Act
Kim et al v. Nyce et al
as 8:2009cv01572
Plaintiff:
Eun O. Kim, Amy Hsang-Chi Tong, Chin Kim and others
Defendant:
Douglas A. Nyce, Nyce and Co., Inc. and Parcel K- Tudor Hall Farm LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
Kang
as 8:2009cv01561
Petitioner:
Yu Sok Kang and Yu Sok Kang
Defendant:
Rod Rosenstein, Douglas Shulman and Eric Holder
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 6532 IRS: Refund of Tax Penalty
Kang v. Rouse et al
as 1:2008cv02446
Petitioner:
Shin H. Kang
Respondent:
Nancy Rouse and Douglas F. Gansler
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Collins Brothers Corporation v. Grandmart International Food GA No. 5, Inc. et al
as 1:2008mc00061
Plaintiff:
Collins Brothers Corporation
Defendant:
Grandmart International Food GA No. 5, Inc., Grandmart GA No. 5, LLC and Min Sik Kang
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Type:
Other Statutes
Kang et al v. Gonzales et al
as 1:2007cv01657
Plaintiff:
Bok Sun Kang, Nam Soo Kang and Soo Hyong Kang
Defendant:
Alberto Gonzales, Michael Chertoff, Emilio T. Gonzalez and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Kang et al v. Gonzales et al
as 8:2007cv00727
Plaintiff:
Soon Ok Kang, Soon Ok Kang, Chang Ku Kang and others
Defendant:
Alberto Gonzales, Michael Chertoff, Emilio T. Gonzalez and others
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Naturalization Hearing
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
