Cases 11 - 15 of 15
Abreu v. Countryman
as 12-2723
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Carlos Abreu
Defendant:
Michael Rasmus, Hearing Officer, David Stein, Teacher, Jerry Jones, Sergeant and others
Defendant - Appellee:
Barry Countryman, Correction Officer, Annette Holm, Nurse, Albert Prack, Special Housing Unit/Disciplinary Program and others
Crichlow v. Fischer
as 12-1454
Plaintiff:
Armando Colon
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Kevin Damion Crichlow
Defendant - Appellee:
Brian Fischer, Commissioner, Department of Correctional Services, Ellen Youssef, Doctor, Downstate Correctional Facility, John Doe, Doctor, Downstate Correctional Facility and others
Smith v. Martuscello, Jr.
as 11-5168
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Aurel Smith, on behalf of himself and all similarly situated prisoners at Coxsackie Correctional Facility
Defendant - Appellee:
David F. Martuscello, Jr., Superintendent, Coxsackie Correctional Facility, Brian Fischer, Commissioner, Department of Correctional Services, Lucien J. Leclaire, Deputy Commissioner for Facility Operations and others
Watson v. Wright
as 11-4308
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Charles Watson
Defendant:
Ronald Moscicki, Superintendent, Lakeview Correctional Facility, R. Moffit, DSA, Lakeview Correctional Facility, Caissley, Facility Health Services Director, Lakeview Correctional Facility and others
Defendant - Appellee:
Lester N. Wright, Department of Correctional Service, Chief Medical Officer and Azevedo Doyon, FHSD, Clinton Correctional Facility
Charles Watson v. Ronald Moscicki
as 10-441
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Charles Watson
Defendant:
Ronald Moscicki, Superintendent, Lakeview Correctional Facility, R. Moffit, DSA, Lakeview Correctional Facility, Caissley, Facility Health Services Director, Lakeview Correctional Facility and others
Defendant - Appellee:
Lester N. Wright, DOCS Chief Medical Officer and Azevedo Doyon, FHSD, Clinton Correctional Facility
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
