Cases 11 - 20 of 193
Murphy v. Slootman et al
as 1:2024cv00426
Plaintiff:
Patrick M. Murphy, Jr.
Defendant:
Frank Slootman, Michael P. Scarpelli, Benoit Dageville and others
Chrustowski v. Equal Employment Services, et al
as 1:2024cv00418
Plaintiff:
Renee A. Chrustowski
Defendant:
Equal Employment Services, Emily Davis, Mai Hoang and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Tiwaz v. Buckle
as 1:2024cv00408
Plaintiff:
Miss Tiwaz, Miss Cea Gleanbead Mai, Sir Tiwaz and others
Defendant:
Lt. Lewis R. Buckle, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tiwaz v. Ceresini et al
as 1:2024cv00386
Plaintiff:
Miss Tiwaz, Sir Tiwaz, Cea Gleanbead Mai and others
Defendant:
Scott Ceresini, Captain Scott Bradley, Wise and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tiwaz v. Lowe et al
as 1:2024cv00384
Plaintiff:
Miss Tiwaz, Sir Tiwaz, Cea Gleanbead Mai and others
Defendant:
Dale Lowe, Erin, Staff Lt. Dean J. Blades and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Walsh v. Transphorm, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00373
Plaintiff:
Ryan Walsh
Defendant:
Transphorm, Inc., Primit Parikh, Umesh Mishra and others
Smith v. Transphorm, Inc et al
as 1:2024cv00371
Plaintiff:
Tara Smith
Defendant:
Transphorm, Inc, Primit Parikh, Umesh Mishra and others
Tiwaz v. Hanna et al
as 1:2024cv00235
Plaintiff:
Sir Tiwaz, Cea Gleanbead Mai, Cea G. Mai and others
Defendant:
Adrienne M. Hanna, Cerisini, Wise and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Keritsis v. Hayes et al
as 1:2023cv01351
Nominal Defendant:
RTX Corporation and Raytheon Technologies Corporation
Plaintiff:
George Keritsis
Defendant:
Gregory Hayes, Tracy A. Atkinson, Leanne G. Caret and others
Williams v. Dunn et al
as 1:2023cv01311
Plaintiff:
Ronnie C. Williams and Ronald C. Williams
Defendant:
Diana Dunn, Kelly Sheridan, Joshuah Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
