Cases 11 - 20 of 21
WATSON et al v. WATERS
as 5:2011cv02368
Plaintiff:
DAWN M. WATSON and JORGE L. MARTINEZ
Defendant:
VANESSA N. WATERS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MARTINEZ v. FIBREBOARD CORPORATION et al
as 2:2010cv76098
Plaintiff:
JIMMIE L. MARTINEZ
Defendant:
FIBREBOARD CORPORATION , JAMES R. COLSON and JAMES H. COLWELL
Thirdparty_defendant:
JAMES E. BURKE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MARTINEZ v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2010cv40176
Plaintiff:
EUGENIO L. MARTINEZ
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
MARTINEZ v. FIBREBOARD CORPORATION
as 2:2010cv71771
Plaintiff:
BARBARA L. MARTINEZ
Defendant:
FIBREBOARD CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MARTINEZ V. UNITED STATES LINES INC. REORGANIZATION TRUST
as 2:2010cv34871
Plaintiff:
ANGEL L MARTINEZ
Defendant:
UNITED STATES LINES INC. REORGANIZATION TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
FORD v. MARTINEZ et al
as 2:2009cv03059
Plaintiff:
GARY DREW FORD
Defendant:
ANGELO L. MARTINEZ, JAMES A. GILLIN and DELAWARE COUNTY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
MARTINEZ et al v. AMCHEM PRODUCTS INC et al
as 2:2009cv67039
Plaintiff:
JOSE P. MARTINEZ, SR., JOSE P. MARTINEZ, SR., DIANE L. MARTINEZ and others
Defendant:
AMCHEM PRODUCTS INC, AMCHEM PRODUCTS INC, AMCHEM PRODUCTS INC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
MARTINEZ v. ASTRUE
as 5:2009cv00931
Plaintiff:
CARMEN L. MARTINEZ
Defendant:
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
MARTINEZ v. ACANDS, INC. et al
as 2:2008cv89797
Plaintiff:
JOE L MARTINEZ
Defendant:
ACANDS, INC., ACANDS, INC., ANCHOR PACKING COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
GRAY v. MARTINEZ et al
as 2:2008cv02603
Plaintiff:
T. BARRY GRAY
Defendant:
ANGELA L. MARTINEZ, DEBORAH L. GASTON, TCIF REO CIT, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
