Cases 11 - 20 of 38
Colon v. Fox Lake Correctional Institution
as 2:2018cv00794
Plaintiff:
Israel Colon
Defendant:
Fox Lake Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sunke, Timothy v. Fox Lake Correctional Institution et al
as 3:2017cv00866
Plaintiff:
Timothy C. Sunke
Defendant:
Fox Lake Correctional Institution , David Stonefeld and Candace Whitman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jessie, Aquilla v. Wouts, Alex et al
as 3:2017cv00840
Plaintiff:
Aquilla Jessie
Defendant:
Alex Wouts , Randall R. Hepp, Mark Schomisch and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lavidas v. Lake Correctional Institution et al
as 5:2017cv00279
Plaintiff:
Theodore Lavidas
Defendant:
Lake Correctional Institution and Reginald Haywood
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lavidas v. Lake Correctional Institution et al
as 6:2017cv01119
Plaintiff:
Theodore Lavidas
Defendant:
Lake Correctional Institution and Reginald Haywood
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith, Tyrone v. Fox Lake Correctional Institution et al
as 3:2017cv00396
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Davis Smith and Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources, ex rel.
Defendant:
Fox Lake Correctional Institution, Randall R. Hepp , Health Service Unit of Fox Lake Correctional Institution and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Fox Lake Correctional Institution
as 2:2016cv01654
Petitioner:
Tyrone Davis Smith
Respondent:
Fox Lake Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Woods v. Lake Correctional Institution et al
as 5:2016cv00463
Plaintiff:
Dannis C. Woods
Defendant:
Lake Correctional Institution, FNU Excellent, FNU Eurourth and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Anderson v. ICT et al
as 8:2015cv02873
Plaintiff:
Hans Christian Anderson
Defendant:
ICT and Lake Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Anderson v. ICT et al
as 5:2015cv00629
Plaintiff:
Hans Christian Anderson
Defendant:
ICT and Lake Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
