Cases 11 - 20 of 35
Recycle for Change v. City of Oakland
as 16-15295
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RECYCLE FOR CHANGE
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF OAKLAND, a California Municipal Corporation
Amicus Curiae:
PLANET AID, INC. and LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES
Hawaii Wildlife Fund, et al v. County of Maui
as 15-17447
Plaintiff - Appellee:
HAWAII WILDLIFE FUND, a Hawaii non-profit corporation, SIERRA CLUB - MAUI GROUP, a non-profit corporation, SURFRIDER FOUNDATION, a non-profit corporation and others
Defendant - Appellant:
COUNTY OF MAUI
Amicus Curiae:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, STATE OF ARIZONA, Alabama, Alaska, Arkansas, Georgia, Indiana, Kansas, Louisiana, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, Nevada, Oklahoma, South Carolina, Texas, Utah, West Virginia, and Wyoming, AMERICAN IRON AND STEEL INSTITUTE and others
Amicus Curiae - Pending:
ASSOCIATION OF CALIFORNIA WATER AGENCIES, CALIFORNIA ASSOCIATION OF SANITATION AGENCIES, CALIFORNIA STATE ASSOCIATION OF COUNTIES and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 15-56606
Third-party-plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Third-party-defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Third-party-defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Amicus Curiae:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 14-17521
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Amicus Curiae:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
John Teixeira, et al v. County of Alameda, et al
as 13-17132
Amicus Curiae:
FIREARMS POLICY COALITION, YOUTH ALIVE!, ERWIN CHEMERINSKY and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
STEVE NOBRIGA, JOHN TEIXEIRA, GARY GAMAZA and others
Defendant / Appellee:
NATE MILEY, in his official capacity, ALAMEDA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS, as a policy making body, WILMA CHAN, in her official capacity and others
Adam Richards, et al v. Ed Prieto, et al
as 11-16255
Amicus Curiae:
MAJOR CITIES CHIEFS ASSOCIATION, LAW ENFORCEMENT ACTION NETWORK, NATIONAL RIFLE ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA, INC. and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SECOND AMENDMENT FOUNDATION, ADAM RICHARDS, CALGUNS FOUNDATION, INC. and others
Defendant / Appellee:
COUNTY OF YOLO and ED PRIETO
Edward Peruta, et al v. County of San Diego, et al
as 10-56971
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CALIFORNIA RIFLE AND PISTOL ASSOCIATION FOUNDATION, LESLIE BUNCHER, Dr., MICHELLE LAXSON and others
Intervenor:
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
Amicus Curiae:
MAJOR CITIES CHIEFS ASSOCIATION, CALIFORNIA POLICE CHIEFS' ASSOCIATION, ROBERT T. DOYLE, Marin County Sheriff and others
Defendant / Appellee:
COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO and WILLIAM D. GORE, individually and in his capacity as Sheriff
MHC Financing Limited Partners, et al v. City of San Rafael, et al
as 09-16612
Plaintiff - Appellee:
MHC FINANCING LIMITED PARTNERSHTIP, an Illinois limited partnership and GRAPELAND VISTA, INC., an Illinois corporation
Defendant:
CITY OF SAN RAFAEL
Defendant-intervenor - Appellant:
CONTEMPO MARIN HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION
Amicus Curiae:
GOLDEN STATE MANUFACTURED HOME OWNERS LEAGUE, INC
Amicus Curiae - Pending:
LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES and CALIFORNIA STATE ASSOCIATION OF COUNTIES
MHC Financing Limited Partners, et al v. City of San Rafael, et al
as 09-16613
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MHC FINANCING LIMITED PARTNERSHTIP, an Illinois limited partnership and GRAPELAND VISTA, INC., an Illinois corporation
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF SAN RAFAEL
Defendant-intervenor - Appellee:
CONTEMPO MARIN HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION
Amicus Curiae - Pending:
LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES and CALIFORNIA STATE ASSOCIATION OF COUNTIES
MHC Financing Limited Partners, et al v. City of San Rafael, et al
as 09-16451
Plaintiff - Appellee:
MHC FINANCING LIMITED PARTNERSHTIP, an Illinois limited partnership and GRAPELAND VISTA, INC., an Illinois corporation
Defendant - Appellant:
CITY OF SAN RAFAEL
Defendant-intervenor - Appellee:
CONTEMPO MARIN HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION
Amicus Curiae:
GOLDEN STATE MANUFACTURED HOME OWNERS LEAGUE, INC
Amicus Curiae - Pending:
LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES and CALIFORNIA STATE ASSOCIATION OF COUNTIES
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
