Cases 11 - 20 of 28
Leonard et al v. White Horse Development et al
as 2:2015cv00728
Plaintiff:
Curtis Leonard and Genevieve Leonard
Defendant:
White Horse Development , Mark Griffith , Garlett Construction and others
Counter_claimant:
Mark Griffith and White Horse Development
Counter_defendant:
Curtis Leonard and Genevieve Leonard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Kaminski v. Colvin
as 2:2015cv00531
Plaintiff:
Leonard Kaminski
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405
Heitz v. West Jordan Police Department
as 2:2012cv00973
Plaintiff:
Leonard Joseph Heitz, III
Defendant:
West Jordan Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Main Street Church of Brigham City v. Brigham City et al
as 1:2012cv00186
Plaintiff:
Main Street Church of Brigham City
Defendant:
Brigham City , Kirk Morgan , Paul A. Tittensor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lucero v. LNU
as 2:2011cv01210
Plaintiff:
Leonard James Lucero
Defendant:
Bob LNU
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Klein v. Sternheim
as 2:2011cv01105
Plaintiff:
R. Wayne Klein
Defendant:
Leonard Sternheim
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Lucero v. Claudia et al
as 2:2011cv01001
Plaintiff:
Leonard J. Lucero
Defendant:
LNU Claudia, LNU Micah and LNU Alex
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Leonard v. IHC Health Services et al
as 2:2011cv00892
Plaintiff:
Andrew Paul Leonard
Defendant:
IHC Health Services
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Nilson et al v. JP Morgan Chase Bank et al
as 1:2009cv00121
Plaintiff:
Ezra K. Nilson, Ezra K. Nilson, Ezra K. Nilson and others
Defendant:
JP Morgan Chase Bank, Bank of America, Wachovia Bank and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Contract Dispute
Kahn v. iBiquity Digital et al
as 2:2009cv00814
Plaintiff:
Leonard R. Kahn
Defendant:
iBiquity Digital, Lucent Technologies, Clear Channel Communications and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
