Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 20
Law Enforcement Health Benefits Inc. v. AbbVie Inc et al
as 1:2019cv02415
Defendant: AbbVie Inc, Amgen Inc and AbbVie Biotechnology, Ltd.
Plaintiff: Law Enforcement Health Benefits Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
In Re: Humira (Adalimumab) Antitrust Litigation We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2019cv01873
Defendant: MYLAN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., SANDOZ, INC., MOMENTA PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. and others
Plaintiff: UFCW LOCAL 1500 WELFARE FUND, Plaintiffs, Locals 302 & 612 of the International Union of Operating Engineers-Employers Construction Industry Health and Security Trust Fund and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Law Enforcement Health Benefits Inc. v. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation et al
as 1:2018cv05603
Defendant: Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation , Novartis AG, Novartis Corporation and others
Plaintiff: Law Enforcement Health Benefits Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Law Enforcement Health Benefits Inc. v. Merck & Co., Inc. et al
as 2:2018cv01003
Plaintiff: Law Enforcement Health Benefits Inc.
Defendant: Merck & Co, Inc. , Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. , Schering-Plough Corp. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
In Re: Zetia (Ezetimibe) Antitrust Litigation
as 2:2018md02836
Defendant: Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp., Glenmark Pharmaceuticals, Ltd., MSP Singapore Co. LLC and others
Plaintiff: FWK Holdings, LLC, HEB Grocery Company L.P., All End Payer Plaintiffs and others
In Re: In Re: Zetia (Ezetimibe) Antitrust Litigation
Interested Party: Zydus Pharmaceuticals (USA) Inc., Apotex USA, Inc. and Apotex Corp., WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI, P.C. and others
Intervenor Plaintiff: KPH Healthcare Services, Inc., McKesson Corporation, Cardinal Health, Inc. and others
Petitioner: AmerisourceBergen Corporation, AmerisourceBergen Drug Corporation, H.D. Smith, LLC and others
Consolidated Plaintiff: Giant Eagle, Inc., Burlington Drug Company, Inc., Dakota Drug, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
In re Novartis and Par Antitrust Litigation We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2018cv04361
Defendant: Endo Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Par Pharmaceutical, Inc., Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation and others
Plaintiff: Drogueria Betances, LLC, H-E-B LP, Rite Aid Hdqtrs. Corp., and others
Consolidated Plaintiff: Law Enforcement Health Benefits Inc., Turlock Irrigation District and UFCW Local 1500 Welfare Fund
Respondent: Mylan Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Not Classified By Court: Lupin Ltd., Lupin Pharmaceuticals, Inc., OptumRX, Inc. and others
Interested Party: Caremark PHC, LLC and Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation (Monopolizing Trade)
Law Enforcement Health Benefits Inc. v. Merck & Co., Inc. et al
as NYE/1:18-cv-01900
Plaintiff: Law Enforcement Health Benefits Inc.
Defendant: Merck & Co., Inc. , Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. , Schering-Plough Corp. and others
International Union of Operating Engineers Local 49 Health and Welfare Fund on behalf of itself and all others similarly situated v. Merck & Co., Inc. et al
as VAE/2:18-cv-00130
Plaintiff: International Union of Operating Engineers Local 49 Health and Welfare Fund on behalf of itself and all others similarly situated and Law Enforcement Health Benefits Inc.
Defendant: Merck & Co., Inc. , Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. , Schering-Plough Corp. and others
Law Enforcement Health Benefits Inc. v. Merck & Co., Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv01900
Defendant: Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp., Glenmark Generics Inc., U.S.A., Glenmark Pharmaceuticals, Ltd. and others
Plaintiff: Law Enforcement Health Benefits Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
City of Providence, Rhode Island v. Merck & Co., Inc. et al
as MA/1:18-cv-10498
Plaintiff: City of Providence, Rhode Island and Law Enforcement Health Benefits Inc.
Defendant: Merck & Co., Inc. , Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. , Schering-Plough Corp. and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?