Cases 11 - 20 of 42
Roberts v. Wasden
as 1:2017cv00388
Petitioner:
Michael Dale Roberts
Respondent:
Lawrence G Wasden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Charboneau v. Atencio et al
as 1:2017cv00364
Petitioner:
Jaime Dean Charboneau
Respondent:
Henry Atencio and Lawrence G Wasden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Collis v. Epis et al
as 4:2016cv00483
Plaintiff:
Colt Esmond Collis
Defendant:
David Epis, Michael Oths, Ryan Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CenturyLink Communications, LLC v. State of Idaho et al
as 1:2016cv00378
Plaintiff:
CenturyLink Communications, LLC
Defendant:
State of Idaho, Idaho Department of Administration, Robert L Geddes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Education Networks of America, Inc. v. State of Idaho et al
as 1:2016cv00379
Plaintiff:
Education Networks of America, Inc.
Defendant:
State of Idaho, Idaho Department of Administration, J. Michael Gwartney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Austin v. Wasden et al
as 4:2016cv00172
Plaintiff:
Wesley Wayne Austin
Defendant:
Lawrence G Wasden, Claudia Christain, Marielle Pratt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Paulk v. Kempf et al
as 1:2016cv00118
Petitioner:
Thomas Zachary Alec Paulk
Respondent:
Kevin Kempf and Lawrence G Wasden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Matthews v. Stancil et al
as 1:2015cv00578
Petitioner:
Danny E. Matthews
Respondent:
M.A. Stancil and Lawrence G Wasden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Matthews v. Stancil et al
as 1:2015cv00563
Petitioner:
Danny E. Matthews
Respondent:
M.A. Stancil and Lawrence G Wasden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Planned Parenthood of the Great Northwest and the Hawaiian Islands v. Wasden et al
as 1:2015cv00557
Plaintiff:
Planned Parenthood of the Great Northwest and the Hawaiian Islands
Defendant:
Lawrence G Wasden , Jan M. Bennetts , Grant P Loebs and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
