Cases 11 - 18 of 18
Edmond v. Digital Legal Services-TX, LLC et al
as 4:2013cv01510
Plaintiff:
Tammie Edmond
Defendant:
Digital Legal Services-TX, LLC and Principal Life Insurance Company
Counter_claimant:
Principal Life Insurance Company and Digital Legal Services-TX, LLC
Counter_defendant:
Tammie Edmond
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Oliver v. The United States of America Government et al
as 4:2012cv01199
Plaintiff:
Ellery Cornelius Oliver
Defendant:
The United States of America Government, The United States Supreme Court, The United States Congress and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plainfield Specialty Holding II Inc v. Children's Legal Services PLLC et al
as 4:2009mc00155
Plaintiff:
Plainfield Specialty Holding II Inc
Defendant:
Children's Legal Services PLLC and Kenneth A Stern
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2008cv02291
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Tinlin v. Mailroom at the Bill Clements Unit et al
as 2:2008cv00173
Plaintiff:
Tim Daniel Tinlin
Defendant:
Mailroom at the Bill Clements Unit, TDCJ - State Counsel for Offenders Legal Services Section, Bill Clements Computer Department and Law Library and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Mason Tenders District Counsel Welfare Fund et al v. Arey Construction Corporation et al
as 4:2008mc00366
Plaintiff:
Mason Tenders District Counsel Welfare Fund, Pension Fund, Annuity Fund and others
Defendant:
Arey Construction Corporation, Stroika Ltd and Peter Sareyani
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2007cv02510
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Age)
Edmond v. Roberts et al
as 4:2007cv00999
Plaintiff:
Ronald Wayne Edmond
Defendant:
M Roberts, Kesshder, Vincent and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
