Cases 11 - 20 of 60
Neubig v. Bank of America, N.A. et al
as 1:2016cv00046
Plaintiff:
Kathleen M Neubig
Defendant:
Bank of America, N.A., BSI Financial Services, Inc., Quicken Loans, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1640
Filing Error
as 1:2015cv01478
Plaintiff:
Kathleen M Neubig
Defendant:
David N Bank of America, BSI Financial Services, Inc., Quicken Loans, Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Filing Error
as 1:2015cv01480
Plaintiff:
Kathleen M Neubig
Defendant:
Bank of America, N.A., BSI Financial Services, Inc., Quicken Loans, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Roberts v. Wethington et al
as 4:2015cv00041
Plaintiff:
Roberts and Carol Roberts
Defendant:
Wethington, James Wethington, Robert S. Mink and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 15-3563
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv02749
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 14-4097
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Novak et al v. Lerner, Sampson & Rothfuss, L.P.A. et al
as 1:2014cv02404
Plaintiff:
Jerry Novak and Lisa Novak
Defendant:
Lerner, Sampson & Rothfuss, L.P.A. and Bank of America, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv02308
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Linda Clark, et al v. Lender Processing Services, et al
as 13-3799
Defendant / Appellee:
MANLEY DEAS KOCHALSKI, LLC, LENDER PROCESSING SERVICES, LERNER, SAMPSON & ROTHFUSS and others
Plaintiff:
LAURA YEAGER and MICHAEL YEAGER
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LINDA CLARK, DOROTHY L. RYSH, MICHAEL C. RYSH and others
Defendant:
REIMER, ARNOVITZ, CHERNEK & JEFFREY CO.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
