Cases 11 - 20 of 31
SHEPTIN v. ELIAS et al
as 1:2008cv01261
Plaintiff:
LOUIS C. SHEPTIN
Defendant:
RICHARD ELIAS, U. S. PAROLE COMMISSION, US ATTORNEY and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
SHEPTIN v. U. S. PAROLE COMMISSION et al
as 1:2008cv01260
Plaintiff:
LOUIS C. SHEPTIN
Defendant:
U. S. PAROLE COMMISSION and RICHARD ELIAS
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Sheptin v. Wilson et al
as 1:2008cv01944
Petitioner:
Louis C Sheptin
Respondent:
Eric Wilson, D.P. Harvey, MD & Clinical Director and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 08-2070
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Sheptin v. Bureau of Prisons
as 6:2008cv03151
Petitioner:
Louis C Sheptin
Respondent:
Bureau of Prisons, Bureau of Prisons, Warden of the Federal Medical Center and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Sheptin v. Anderson
as 6:2008cv03150
Petitioner:
Louis C Sheptin
Respondent:
Marty C. Anderson and Marty C. Anderson
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Sheptin et al v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 6:2008cv03143
Petitioner:
Louis C Sheptin
Respondent:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, Federal Bureau of Prisons, Marty C. Anderson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Sheptin v. Doe et al
as 6:2008cv03144
Petitioner:
Louis C Sheptin
Respondent:
John Doe, John Doe, Marty C. Anderson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Sheptin v. Anderson
as 6:2008cv03138
Petitioner:
Louis C Sheptin
Respondent:
Marty C. Anderson, Marty C. Anderson and Attorney General
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Sheptin v. Anderson et al
as 6:2008cv03137
Petitioner:
Louis C Sheptin
Respondent:
Marty C. Anderson, Marty C. Anderson and Attorney General
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
