Cases 11 - 20 of 49
scott v. Martinez
as 2:2022cv06662
Petitioner:
kevin ibn scott
Respondent:
Luis Martinez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Kevin Ibn Scott v. Luis Martinez
as 2:2022cv06663
Petitioner:
Kevin Ibn Scott
Respondent:
Luis Martinez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Harlan et al v. Gilead Sciences, Inc.
as 4:2022cv03156
Plaintiff:
Anthony Harlan, Aaron Sampson, Adam T. Bushman and others
Defendant:
Gilead Sciences Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Jose Luis Martinez Mozo v. William James Marco et al
as 5:2022cv00582
Plaintiff:
Jose Luis Martinez Mozo, Jessica Monserrat Mata Romero and S.L.M.M.
Defendant:
Schneider National Bulk Carriers, Inc., William James Marco and DOES 1 to 30, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Auto Negligence
Sharp v. Martinez
as 3:2022cv00149
Petitioner:
Anthony A. Sharp
Respondent:
People of the State of California and Luis Martinez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
(PS) Grant v. Martinez et al
as 2:2020cv01963
Defendant:
Coffman Specialties, Inc. and Luis - Martinez
Plaintiff:
Mark A. Grant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1396
Jose Luis Martinez v. Ralph Diaz et al
as 5:2020cv02027
Defendant:
Anthony Carter, Kenneth J. Pogue, Vance and others
Plaintiff:
Jose Luis Martinez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC)Martinez v. Diaz et al
as 2:2020cv01881
Defendant:
Kuntz, Anthony Carter, Kenneth J. Pogue and others
Plaintiff:
Jose Luis Martinez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LT Properties v. Luis Martinez et al
as 2:2019cv07905
Plaintiff:
LT Properties
Defendant:
Does 1 to 10 and Luis Martinez
Martinez v. Patton et al
as 3:2018cv03480
Plaintiff:
Jose Luis Martinez
Defendant:
B. Patton, D. Melton and C. Parry
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
