Cases 11 - 20 of 24
Clark v. Focus Receivables Management, LLC
as 1:2013cv08647
Plaintiff:
Elaine M Clark
Defendant:
Focus Receivables Management, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv07430
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Clark et al v. Fakic et al
as 3:2013cv01033
Plaintiff:
Bruce M. Clark and Lynn A. Clark
Defendant:
Amir Fakic , CSX Intermodal Terminals, Inc. and CSX Intermodal, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Clark, et al v Zimmer, Inc., et al
as 1:2013cv06821
In_re:
In Re: Zimmer Nexgen Knee Implant Products Liability Litigation
Plaintiff:
Donna M. Clark and John T. Clark
Defendant:
Zimmer, Inc., Zimmer Holdings, Inc. and Zimmer Orthopaedic Surgical Products, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Clark v. Hardy et al
as 1:2012cv01385
Plaintiff:
Robert M. Clark
Defendant:
Marcus Hardy, Lisa Madigan and Service List
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Clark v. Hardy et al
as 1:2012cv07262
Petitioner:
Robert M. Clark
Respondent:
Marcus Hardy and Lisa Madigan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Clark et al v. Village of Lyons et al
as 1:2011cv06895
Plaintiff:
Richard M. Clark, Charles E. Alexander and Eugene Eddy
Defendant:
Village of Lyons, D. Dyas, R. Wiggins and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Holm et al v. Clark et al
as 1:2011cv01798
Plaintiff:
Nick W Holm and Daniel M. Holm
Defendant:
Jason M Clark , Sheldon R. Sobol , Ryan Gasteier and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Benson v. Walker et al
as 3:2010cv00579
Plaintiff:
Matthew L Benson
Defendant:
Roger E. Walker, Jr., John D Evans, Harold H Schuler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Benson v. Walker et al
as 3:2010cv03192
Plaintiff:
Matthew L Benson
Defendant:
Roger E. Walker, Jr., John D Evans, Harold H Schuler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
