Cases 11 - 20 of 33
County Commissioner of Mayes County, Oklahoma v. Purdue Pharma, L.P. et al
as 1:2019op45227
Defendant:
McKesson Corporation, Purdue Pharma L.P., Mallinckrodt LLC and others
Plaintiff:
County Commissioner of Mayes County, Oklahoma
Mayes v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2018cv01798
Defendant:
Davol Inc. and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Debbie Mayes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Electra et al v. Dreamers Cabaret, LLC et al
as 5:2018cv02706
Plaintiff:
Ursula Mayes, Rachel Koren, Laurie Romeo and others
Defendant:
1110 Brittain Road, LLC, Dreamers Cabaret, LLC and Dreamers Cabaret
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Banx et al v. The Princeton Club, LLC
as 2:2018cv01389
Plaintiff:
Paola Canas, Ursula Mayes, John Coulter and others
Defendant:
The Princeton Club, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Burciaga et al v. Crazy Horse Licensing, Inc et al
as 1:2018cv02464
Defendant:
Entertainment Dynamics LLC, Crazy Horse Licensing, Inc, Parkbrook Entertainment Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Paola Canas, Tiffany Selby, Jessica Burciaga and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Mayes v. Capital Recovery Systems, Inc.
as 2:2015cv02434
Plaintiff:
Mark Mayes
Defendant:
Capital Recovery Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Mayes et al v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2015cv01993
Plaintiff:
Crystal Mayes and Thomas Tucker Mayes
Defendant:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Mayes v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2015cv01543
Plaintiff:
Viola Mayes
Defendant:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Edwards v. Dayton Police Department et al
as 3:2015cv00135
Plaintiff:
Drake A Edwards
Defendant:
Dayton Police Department, Rieff, Mayes and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Mayes v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2015cv01060
Plaintiff:
Frankie D. Mayes
Defendant:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
