Cases 11 - 20 of 36
Crichlow v. Doe et al
as 1:2012cv00303
Plaintiff:
Keino S. Crichlow
Defendant:
John Doe, Jane Doe, Commissioner of Department of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thornton v. Chandler et al
as 1:2011cv00860
Plaintiff:
Raymond E. Thornton
Defendant:
Chandler, Lawson, Michael Deloy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bredbenner v. Malloy et al
as 1:2011cv00739
Plaintiff:
Donald Bredbenner
Defendant:
Robert Malloy, Doane, Ihoma Chuks and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Warren v. Phelps et al
as 1:2011cv00653
Plaintiff:
Dwayne Warren
Defendant:
Perry Phelps, Michael Deloy, Richard Kearney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Powell v. Dutton et al
as 1:2011cv00486
Plaintiff:
Edward L. Powell, III
Defendant:
Rebecca Dutton, Michael Little, Lisa Merson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Danberg et al
as 1:2011cv00262
Plaintiff:
Sherrhonda L. Williams
Defendant:
Carl Danberg, Thomas Carter, Michael Deloy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis v. Danberg et al
as 1:2011cv00265
Plaintiff:
Virginia Davis
Defendant:
Carl Danberg, Tom Carrol, Michael Deloy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
James Biggins v. Jack Markell, et al
as 11-1560
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES ARTHUR BIGGINS
Defendant - Appellee:
JOSEPH W. BOOTH, JACK MARKELL, CARL C. DANBERG and others
Debtor - Appellee:
LINCOLN D. WILLIS
Johnas Ortiz v. Joseph Biden, III, et al
as 11-1238
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHNAS ORTIZ
Defendant - Appellee:
JOSEPH R. BIDEN, III, ATTY GEN DE, CARL C. DANBERG, Commissioner, Dept. of Corrections and others
Ortiz v. Biden et al
as 1:2010cv00920
Petitioner:
Johnas Ortiz
Respondent:
Joseph Biden, III, Attorney General of the State of Delaware, Carl Danberg and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
