Cases 11 - 20 of 20
Laffoon v. Superior Supervaks LLC et al
as 5:2013cv01155
Plaintiff:
Sherry A Laffoon
Defendant:
Superior Supervaks LLC and Monty Lee Woods
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
United Financial Casualty Company v. Maxum Indemnity Company et al
as 5:2012cv00581
Plaintiff:
United Financial Casualty Company
Defendant:
Maxum Indemnity Company, Bobbie Shane Griffin, Shane Higginbotham and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Casey v. Brinker Oklahoma Inc
as 5:2012cv00296
Plaintiff:
Monty Casey
Defendant:
Brinker Oklahoma Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2011cv00802
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Cain et al v. Noble Energy Inc
as 5:2011cv00688
Plaintiff:
Christopher F Cain , Shane Higginbotham , Ernie Sessums and others
Defendant:
Noble Energy Inc
Third_party_defendant:
Robbie Shane Griffin , High Sierra Water Services Mid-Continent LLC, Quadco Oil Tools and others
Third_party_plaintiff:
Noble Energy Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Randell v. Social Security Administration
as 4:2011cv00215
Plaintiff:
Monty W Randell
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Chimera et al v. Philpot et al
as 6:2009cv00498
Plaintiff:
David Chimera and Brenda Chimera
Defendant:
Johnny Philpot, Tabbie Sutterfield, Joey Oliver and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2009cv01104
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2009cv00348
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2008cv00463
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
