Cases 11 - 20 of 20
Gussin v. DigitalGlobe, Inc et al
as 1:2017cv01190
Plaintiff:
Dane Gussin
Defendant:
DigitalGlobe, Inc , Howell M. Estes, Nick S. Cyprus and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Assad v. DigitalGlobe, Inc et al
as 1:2017cv01097
Plaintiff:
George Assad
Defendant:
DigitalGlobe, Inc , Howell M. Estes, III , Nick S. Cyprus and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Macdonald et al v. USA
as 1:2016cv00502
Plaintiff:
Andrew William Macdonald and Sandra Lynne Ray-Shoemaker
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1957
United States of America v. MacDonald et al
as 1:2015cv02153
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Andrew W. MacDonald, Sandra L. Shoemaker, Hope Alliance and others
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7403
Cross, Jr. v. Decker et al
as 1:2014cv03391
Plaintiff:
Elmer L. Cross, Jr.
Defendant:
Decker, Garcia, MacDonald and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Avenue Capital Management II, LP et al v. Schaden et al
as 1:2014cv02031
Plaintiff:
Avenue Capital Management II, LP , Avenue International Master, LP , Avenue Investments, LP and others
Defendant:
Richard F. Schaden, Richard E. Schaden, Frederick H. Schaden and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Garcia v. Dist. 6 Police Dept. et al
as 1:2014cv00038
Plaintiff:
Gerald Garcia
Defendant:
Dist. 6 Police Dept. and MacDonald
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
MacDonald v. Kim
as 1:2012cv02544
Plaintiff:
Bruce MacDonald
Defendant:
Eric Kim
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Houston et al v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as 1:2011cv03130
Plaintiff:
Paul K. Houston and Celia Sharon MacDonald
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MacDonald et al v. Stadler et al
as 1:2011cv02914
Plaintiff:
Ian MacDonald and William Nix
Defendant:
John A. Stadler, K. Ivan F. Gothner, David Michael Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
