Cases 11 - 20 of 23
Barrow v. Patel et al (MAG+)
as 2:2011cv00007
Plaintiff:
Margie Florence Barrow
Defendant:
Mr. Patel and Beeline
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Johnson et al v. Riley et al
as 7:2010cv02067
Plaintiff:
William Johnson , Annie Pearl Leftwich , Bobbie Morgan and others
Defendant:
Bob Riley and John M Tyson, Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1973
Petty et al v. Process Automation and Simulation Services Inc et al
as 2:2010cv01559
Plaintiff:
Drew Petty and Jason K Samuel
Defendant:
Process Automation and Simulation Services Inc, Mark S McColl, Margie P Hill and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Blanchard v. Norfolk Southern Railway Company, Inc.
as 1:2009cv00770
Plaintiff:
Margie M. Blanchard
Defendant:
Norfolk Southern Railway Company, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Wrongful Death
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2008cv01892
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv00496
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2008cv01291
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Cook, et al v. Campbell, et al
as 2:2001cv01425
Plaintiff:
Binita L. Cook , Margie D. Dexter , James R. Dexter and others
Defendant:
Boyd F. Campbell
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Morgan et al v. Quicksilver Delivery Systems, Inc. et al
as 7:2008cv00149
Plaintiff:
Jill Morgan, Joe Ennis, Garry Butt and others
Defendant:
Quicksilver Delivery Systems, Inc. and Michael White
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2007cv00918
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
