Cases 11 - 20 of 118
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01125
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Freeman v. Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Corrections
as 1:2023cv00270
Plaintiff:
Mario Freeman
Defendant:
Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00112
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Escamilla v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv00443
Plaintiff:
Mario A. Escamilla
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Gibson v. Yaw
as 1:2022cv00773
Plaintiff:
Mario Gibson
Defendant:
Lieutenant Lucy Yaw
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Trollinger v. Bracey et al
as 4:2022cv01905
Plaintiff:
Mario Trollinger
Defendant:
Warden Bracey, Major Hill and L.T. Smallwood
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01518
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Morgan v. XPO Logistics, Inc. et al
as 4:2022cv01232
Plaintiff:
Anthony Morgan
Defendant:
XPO Logistics, Inc. and Mario P. Mauro
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Guerra v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2022cv01056
Plaintiff:
Rojelio Mario Guerra
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration and Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Rodgers v. CR Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2022cv02536
Plaintiff:
Mario Rodgers
Defendant:
CR Bard Incorporated and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
