Cases 11 - 20 of 60
Gavitt v. Smith & Nephew, Inc.
as 1:2019cv01941
Plaintiff:
Maureen Gavitt
Defendant:
Smith & Nephew, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Parks v. Safeway, Inc.
as 8:2018cv03994
Plaintiff:
Maureen Parks
Defendant:
Safeway, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Mony Life Insurance Company of America v. Wilson et al
as 1:2018cv03210
Plaintiff:
MONY Life Insurance Company of America
Defendant:
David Stevens and Maureen A Wilson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2018cv02939
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Mahaney et al v. Dankyi et al
as 8:2018cv02591
Plaintiff:
Christine Doole and Maureen A Mahaney
Defendant:
Angel Luis Nigaglioni Roig, Samuel Dankyi and Adebissi Ayodeji Adekoya
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1364
Franchi v. Sucampo Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al
as 8:2018cv00204
Plaintiff:
Adam Franchi
Defendant:
Sucampo Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Peter Greenleaf, Paul Edick and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Shephard v. Sucampo Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al
as 8:2018cv00191
Plaintiff:
Kyungae Shephard
Defendant:
Sucampo Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Peter Greenleaf, Paul Edick and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Securities Violation
Gregg v. Sucampo Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al
as 8:2018cv00190
Plaintiff:
Linda Gregg
Defendant:
Sucampo Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Peter Greenleaf, Paul Edick and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
Otugo v. Sucampo Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al
as 8:2018cv00173
Plaintiff:
Ositanachi Otugo
Defendant:
Sucampo Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Peter Greenleaf, Paul Edick and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Khafra et al v. Internal Revenue Service et al
as 8:2017cv03100
Plaintiff:
Dia Khafra and Claudia Lystra Khafra
Defendant:
Internal Revenue Service and Maureen A Higgins
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 6213
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
